What type of evaluation design is suitable for analyzing the impact of behavior-modeling training on communication skills?

The pretest/posttest comparison group design is particularly suitable for evaluating the impact of behavior-modeling training on communication skills because it allows researchers to measure the participants' skills before and after the intervention. This design involves assessing the participants’ communication skills through a pretest, implementing the behavior-modeling training, and then conducting a posttest to see any changes in their skills.

By using a comparison group—where one group undergoes the training while another similar group does not—the design strengthens the study’s ability to attribute any observed changes specifically to the training intervention rather than other factors. This comparative approach helps in understanding the effectiveness of the training program in enhancing communication skills and provides a clearer picture of its impact, making it a robust method for evaluating educational effects.

This evaluation design is favored in training settings to gain credible insights and facilitate informed decisions around program effectiveness and potential adjustments needed for future iterations.